PhD researcher and NPE member Paula Tulppo gives her impressions about the conference "The Democratic Recession and Europe in Flux: Everyday Perspectives Workshop"; while Dr. Hanna Lempinen shares some thoughts about her visit to Cernobyl nuclear power plant
Democracy – so easy to proclaim, not so
easy to see in practice. That came visible in the “Democratic Recession and
Europe in Flux: Everyday Perspectives´ Workshop” in Canterbury, England, in
which I participated on September. The event was organized in Canterbury Christ
Church University by The Academic Association for the Contemporary European
Studies (UACES), together with the Collaborative Research Networks (CRN), Europe
and the Everyday. In the workshop researches from
several European universities and research units got together to discuss about
the state of democracy and the fundamental changes in Europe that have been
going on during the past few years. The presentation dealt with issues like the
accountability turn and crisis of democracy, the citizenship in times of crises
including status, rights and identities in disintegrating multilevel politics,
the democracy situation in the Western Balkans, the cartelisation of party
politics including political competition and Eurosceptic parties in Hungary,
Romania and Bulgaria.
Sometimes there are big hopes about the democratic
development but the reality turns out to be different. This brought up Dr. Eva Polanska-Kimunguyi
from London School of Economics in her presentation. She talked about the situation with democracy
in Poland. She argued, that as the third decade of democratic transition comes
to an end in Poland, the desire to control the media amongst political parties
remains high. She also mentioned that the government in Poland engages in
outright authoritarian practices, reversing the outcomes and openly rejecting
the principals of democratic transition.
Being in England, also Brexit was one of
the topics in presentations as well as in the dinner conversations. The term
“democracy” refers to a system of government in which the citizens exercise
power. Sometimes people have said that Brexit is a democratic choice made by
citizens and of course, in practice they are right. Then again, someone can
ask, is a rise of the political populism that has been going on for a while in
different countries around the world also democracy? How to influence citizens´
opinions so that the citizens make choices and practice democracy the way
someone wants to? These kind of questions came to my mind in the workshop while
I was listening to the keynote presentation of Emeritus Professor Karl Cordell
from the University of Plymouth, who talked about populism and the future of
Europe. Democracy is more complicated matter than someone might think.
An Arctic view was brought into this
workshop in the context of the EU and its´ cross-border cooperation on the
northern border between Finland and Sweden. The EU is large organization in
many ways and there is a construction that aims to keep up the democracy in the
EU. How well the voice of local people is heard in the EU when it comes for
example to develop their home region? And on the other hand, how much local
people use the democratic opportunities the EU offers? That is something to
consider since after all, democracy is necessity.

Text and pictures by Paula Tulppo
Chernobyl through the eyes of an energy researcher
One
of the worst nuclear accidents in history took place at the Chernobyl nuclear
power plant in the Soviet Union (nowadays Ukraine) on April 26, 1986. While the
radioactive fallout can still be detected even thousands of kilometers away
from the disaster site, it was the areas near the power plant that suffered the
most dramatic impacts. Pripyat, a town roughly the size of our Rovaniemi,
was evacuated during the following day in a matter of hours. Its residents will
never have the chance to return to their homes.




While the total death toll of the Chernobyl accident remains under debate, without the luck of favorable wind conditions and the rescue workers who sacrificed their health and lives to minimize the damage caused by the accident and to prevent another, potentially even more destructive explosion, the disaster would have claimed many more lives. Today the closed 30-kilometer zone around the power plant is a tourist attraction open for visitors for short and structured day trips. A visit at the site a must for anyone who wants to see how fast nature can swallow the structures that our societies build to withstand the test of time. The Zone also forces its visitor eye to eye with the worst-case scenario of what happens when the risks that we inevitably take with nuclear energy production turn into gruesome reality.



Text and pictures by Hanna Lempinen