New Publication on Resettlement Policy in the Russian North
19.8.2011 10:56
A new Arctic Centre research publication by political anthropologist Elena Nuykina shows that resettlement policy in the Russian North has been a top-down process, leaving limited space for regional interference. Russian northern relocation projects stand for a policy which considers population groups as passive elements "moved by the state" due to economic, military and geopolitical interests. However, the study shows that proactive northern residents have their own strategies to seek better living conditions for themselves and their families, using creatively the state’s relocation programmes for their own interests.
As
a part of the Arctic Centre's anthropology research team project
MOVE-INNOCOM, the research focuses on administrative migration
assistance programs and their implementation results on two northern
regions, Murmansk Oblast and Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug (YNAO). Both
programmes concentrate on residents of closing settlements, disabled,
pensioners and non-working citizens, those who 'create a burden on
northern budgets'. At the current stage, the resettlement process is
carried out through a housing certificate scheme that allows people to
choose a place of destination and type of housing.
"The important
question arising from the regulatory perspective on demographic changes
is: What population is 'welcome' to reside in the North and who should
leave? The Russian government makes this distinction clear: those who
cannot contribute to economic growth should be encouraged to move",
Elena Nuykina says in the study.
The attempts of the state to
artificially 'engineer' the social structure did not meet its objective
and caused an insignificant impact on either population change or
northern development in general. The northern resettlement policy has
not worked as it was initially aimed.
"Northerners rely on the
state in helping them to resettle since it was the state that brought
them to the North in the first place. However, when they get migration
assistance in many cases beneficiaries use the subsidies for a different
purpose. In practice, the decision to migrate is not simply planned in
accordance with the logic of neo-classical economics. It includes
determinants poorly considered by policy planners, such as accumulated
social capital, personal experiences, and memories attaching people to
the place."
Nuykina says that one option of bringing programmes
closer to the target population would be through delegating the decisive
power to the regions, allowing them to determine how the programme
should function in their territory and adjusting relocation schemes
according to the local context.
According to senior researcher
Florian Stammler, coordinator of the Arctic Anthropology Research team
at the Arctic Centre, the study can be interpreted in the larger
context:
"This work speaks to the inherent tension between laws
that claim to be standardised throughout the whole country and valid for
all citizens, and human practice on the ground, which has a sheer
endless diversity to respond to such standardised models of
development."
Background of the research
Elena Nuykina's study
is part of the research project Assessing senses of place, mobility and
viability in industrial northern communities (2006–2010, BOREAS
MOVE-INNOCOM), funded by the Academy of Finland. The project focused on
processes of mobility and locality as induced by the Soviet and Russian
State in the two northern Russian regions. The main focus was on life
histories of non-native northerners living in industrial cities, their
sense of place and their movement and settlement decisions.
The
North was one of the main priorities of the Soviet state’s development
policy from 1930 to 1980. The strategy of northern development was built
upon the centralized redistribution of both human and financial
resources to the northern territories, aimed at the industrial
development of the North and exploitation of mineral wealth to bear
export revenues for the national budget.
Liberalisation of the
economic and political spheres in the early 1990s significantly
transformed the state’s approach to its northern periphery. Permanently
inhabited northern cities retain their importance as a fortress of state
power in the Arctic region and centres of further exploitation of
northern mineral wealth. On the other hand, previous state-planning and
extensive subsidising changed to a development strategy that relied on
profit-oriented cost-cutting measures, including restructuring northern
industries, downsizing northern settlements, eliminating 'unpromising
communities', and facilitating out-migration.
Publication:
Elena
Nuykina (2011): Resettlement from the Russian North: An Analysis of
State-Induced Relocation Policy. Guest edited and with a preface by
Florian Stammler. Arctic Centre Reports 55.
Printed copy orders or electronic version:
www.arcticcentre.org/anthropology
For more information, please contact:
Senior researcher Florian Stammler, tel. +358 400 138 807, florian.stammler(at)ulapland.fi
|